Welcome!

Welcome to the Sustainable Oban blog where you can post your thoughts and answers to developing and improving the sustainability of Oban and its environs.

Thursday, 20 September 2012

Windfarms could provide windfall for local communities

Hi again

Happy to forward news that the government looks into incentives, such as discounted electricity bills or new playgrounds, for areas that install turbines, just in via the LEG – Lochaber Environmental Group:

Windfarms could provide windfall for local communities

[Press Association/The Guardian, 20 Sept 2012]

Communities that have windfarms in their area could get money off their electricity bills or grants for facilities such as playgrounds, the government has suggested. The Department of Energy and Climate Change has launched a consultation into how communities could benefit from having windfarms sited near them, for example by receiving discounts on other bills or investment in local infrastructure. It will also look at how local businesses could become involved in the supply chain and how developers can best consult local people. Energy secretary Edward Davey said that too often host communities have seen the "windfarm but not the windfall" and he wants to ensure people benefited from them.
Currently the industry pays a minimum of £1,000 per megawatt of turbines installed to local communities, but in some cases companies provide larger benefits packages. The government is also reviewing the cost of onshore wind to ensure subsidies from April 2014 have been set at the right level. Subsidies are due to be cut by 10% from next year, although there were moves by the Treasury to have them reduced by 25%.
Significant opposition to onshore windfarms has been voiced by a number of Tory MPs, who wanted to see subsidies for the technology slashed, but the latest figures show the majority of people are in favour of the turbines. The latest data from Decc's quarterly survey into public attitudes revealed that 66% of people were in favour of onshore wind, although the figure was lower than for other renewable technologies. Onshore wind had the highest level of opposition of the renewable energy sources, although only 12% opposed the technology, with just 4% strongly opposed to it.
Davey said: "Onshore wind has an important role to play in a diverse energy mix that is secure, low carbon and affordable. We know that two-thirds of people support the growth of onshore wind. But far too often, host communities have seen the windfarms but not the windfall. We are sensitive to the controversy around onshore wind and we want to ensure that people benefit from having windfarms sited near to them.
But the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) warned the government against promoting a system in which communities were "paid off" to secure planning permission for windfarms. Tom Leveridge, senior energy campaigner for CPRE, said: "We must make sure that this does not promote simplistic notions of 'sharing benefits' that amount to little more then paying off communities to secure planning permission. This would fundamentally undermine a core principle of the planning system – that planning permission should not be bought or sold – and put the countryside at greater risk from poorly sited wind developments."

For the original article, see:

Wednesday, 19 September 2012

New Biofuelwatch Report – Sustainable Biomass: A Modern Myth

Hi again
A week ago, Biofuelwatch released a new report, ‘Sustainable Biomass: A Modern Myth’. 

Several years before I arrived in Argyll, I had the opportunity to see the destructive effects of large landowners scrabbling for land to produce the new commodity of "biofuel" in Colombia. It keeps happening, to the great distress of crofters, very small landowners in Las Pavas, Sur de Bolivar.
Here's a video documenting the peaceful resistance of villagers/smallholding farmers against the illegal destruction of their land and of their property by Aportes San Isidro S.A., one of the world's big palm oil producers:
(In Spanish – the farmers' resilience, resistance and faith-based humour is admirable –
they've been fighting this "dirty game" for six years!)

What initially looked like a great idea has contributed to world hunger, mass displacement of people in the third world, and certainly hasn't helped to push us toward reducing our energy consumption, quite the contrary.

The Biofuelwatch report "explores the certification companies certifying biomass as sustainable, the UK government’s proposed sustainability criteria for biomass, and developer’s ‘promises’ to source sustainable biomass."

Download Sustainable biomass: A modern myth –  A review of standards, criteria and schemes certifying industrial biomass as ‘sustainable’, with particular emphasis on UK biomass electricity developments, Biofuelwatch report [Note: File size 4.75 MB]

Download the Report without pictures (831 kb) here.

Download the Executive Summary (4 pages)


And here's a link to a few good, critical articles in The Guardian:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/biofuels